Lynch-Beatt,+Etta

ROUND VI Santana (A) v. Gracetta (N) Judge: Weber (weberdebate@gmail.com for questions)

__Word Bank (look 'em up)__: Majoritarianism

1NC: Your tags are fine, but your clarity when reading cards borders on the unintelligible. Speed is fine, but work on your pronunciation and volume to make sure the judge is flowing your warrants (try varying your voice a bit as well). Also, as your speech wears on this gets worse, so work on finding a sustainable pace that doesn't wear you out. Work on explaining the uniqueness/brink scenario on CTBT. You need a specific brink scenario that explains causality on what "CTBT prevents" (e.g. Iran/Israel, North/South Korea, Russia/NATO, etc.).

CX of 2AC: Start working with Grace to narrow your questions down to finite and targeted questions. When you leave how a question is interpreted up to them, you're letting them frame the argument. On CX, always start with the end in mind; in other words, aim to ask questions that are moving toward a specific goal.

1NR: Good work splitting the block. If you're going to spend time on an overview, set up your argument in a bit more depth (use comparative analysis and warrant analysis)--it will help you frame the argument before getting into your ev. Much clearer this time while reading; your articulation has improved. Keep up your comparative analysis throughout the speech--better flow will help this. Flow will also ensure you're not dropping some key arguments on states (like perms--do these first, they're a priori!). No need to apologize mid-speech--keep trucking

tourney rd 1 Edstrom

2a etta- you must signpost. no reason to read more econ impacts- there are plenty already. your time would be better spent making some analysis about how your case interacts with the da/kritik. why are you reading an Iran war impact? little confused here…read a terminal impact for env collapse. don’t apologize. you’re answering a lot of these arguments effectively, but contextualizing them and starting impact calc now is an excellent idea. I like how you are straight turning cap. good work. your argument on cap needs to be that capitalism creates technological innovation and can create financial impetus for saving the environment. make sure you understand ur impact turns.

7/06
Round 2 Camp Tournament