Bellamy,+Tiana

Rd. 3 Ayaina vs. Clayton (mav.) NEG Tiana, 1NC: If you’re conceding the advantage areas, you don’t have to announce your agreement with the advantages. Also, strategically, it is better to contest the advantages to hedge against the solvency deficits. 1NR: No need to continue impact debates, I would spend a lot of time on the uniqueness and link turns he made. Kick out of the budget DA (you’re stuck with elections, and need to spend more time on it).

7/1/12 - Signpost - what arguments are you answering? - Do more work on case - compare evidence - Prepare to fill your speech time - Affirmatives should put offense on every flow - Overview - at the top, say something along the lines of "I vote affirmative because_"  7/5/12 
 * **#1 thing to work on: Time Allocation **
 * Too many cards on case and not in the right places—you should be reading evidence that growth is good, not evidence that you solve growth—the neg has impact turned your advantage. Most of the 2AC should be analytics on case
 * Good T answers, but the block is a bit too long—try to shorten it down
 * Need better time allocation in the 2AC—you don’t get to the kritik or elections with enough time.
 * Don’t be afraid to interrupt Jared when he’s rambling in cross-x. Just say “thank you, that’s fine”
 * Good prep time allocation
 * Don’t do tag-line extension
 * 2AR is too new in a lot of places